Rape and molestation are serious accusation. However, media has never given accused individual any opportuanity to defend themselves. This is why death of Jimmy Savile is a great interest to MGTOW community. He was accused of raping boys. Most of these kids belong to singer mothers.
I have a feeling that most gold digger were upset that he would not share his loot with anyone so they decided to drum up “victim card”. Ask yourself why did these single mother waited until Jimmy was dead. Same question about Harvey, Bill Cosby, Bill O’Reilly.
Jimmy was born in UK, and remained an anomaly among Men. Some suspected him of being Gay, caused he was not married, nor did he have any serious relationship with a woman. He like other old men are being accused of raping, molesting boys, and even women. Funny, how all of these ladies are single, or lost all of their loot since their hey day in media.
Let’ just look at the pattern:
- Harvey Weinstein
- Bill Cosby
- Bill O’Reilly
- Jimmy Savile
- Edward Heath
They are either dead, or too old to defend themselves. I don’t like anyone them. They are traditionalist. It is ironic that both left leaning, and right leaning mangina went out of there way to worship women. These men promote feminist agenda. These men became have become too old, and feeble to be useful that is why they are being pull down as well!
Gold diggers are like vamires, they need to suck money out of someone. If you are a rich men they will go after you like moth to a flame. Personally, I consider this poetic justice. However, let’s look at the pattern. Let’s go all way back to ancient civilization. I was brought up as Christian — like most in West my faith has very little influence on me.
Current Saga reminds of story from the bible. KJV Genesis 9:20-27.
According to bible this is what hapen between Noah & Ham.
It is very easy to debunk this story. Can you imagine son coming out of his father’s tent and telling his brothers. Guess what guys! I just fucked our father, dman he got tight ass. You guys gotta try it!
And, he lived to see the other day. I apologize for bringing this backward story. I want you guys to understand the mindset of traditionalist.
There is also an underline story in the Genesis. Ham was able to have kids on his own proofs that women like bad boys. Another interesting story is Esther. She decided to go Monica Lewinsky on Persian king, as a result foolish king help Jewish immigrants, and resulted in his own dimise.
If you compare and contrast both story. You will notice that on one hand we have Ham, who just “saw” his father naked. On the other hand we have Esther who wanted a king for herself. King used enjoy making love with eunuchs (male servents without penis).
Noah cursed his won son without any proof. Yet we have a proof that Persian king is perv. However, he “repent” and fall into the charm of a Jewish woman therefore all is forgiven. The message was later used to justify Mary mother of Jesus. Don’t question that she is “virgin” and “pregnant”. Leap faith, and suspend facts & logic.
Why give us a brain and than ask us not to use it….
“But that night the king, being sleepless, ordered the chronicles of the nation to be read to him. Recalling that Mordecai had never been rewarded for his service in revealing the plot of the eunuchs, he asked Haman, the next day, to suggest a suitable reward for one “whom the king desired to honour”. ”
If you need read between the lines. Bible does not have any words to describe sexual organ, or sexual feeling.
- “sleepless” = horny
- “chronicles of the nation” = prostitue
- “plot of the eunuchs” = dickless servents keeping king away from whores
- “whom the king desired to honour” = jewish prostitue tricked him into getting pregnant.
This is what conservatives read, and these traditionalist say they believe in “holy books”. Well, what do you think is influencing them? Feminist, use same story, expect in their case it’s fake media.
Isn’t it amazing things have not change for men in 5,000 years?
20And Noah began to be an husbandman, and he planted a vineyard:
21 And he drank of the wine, and was drunken; and he was uncovered within his tent. 22 And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father, and told his two brethren without. 23 And Shem and Japheth took a garment, and laid it upon both their shoulders, and went backward, and covered the nakedness of their father; and their faces were backward, and they saw not their father’s nakedness.
24 ¶ And Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what his younger son had done unto him. 25 And he said, Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren. 26 And he said, Blessed be the LORD God of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant.
27 God shall enlarge Japheth, and he shall dwell in the tents of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant.
—Authorized King James Version
The last part 27: G-d bless black man big dick, but lord knew that white woman would never sleep with blacks!
Because, he was single, he was not interested in women. When marriage mafia of middle east forced him to have kids. They were branded as evil for the “allege” crime of their father did. Again “curse” was directed towards male descendants.
Remember for all we know that Noah own wife fingered his ass when he was drunk… When he woke up, and he did not know why he was naked.
By the way why would father allowed his son to live – let alone start his own family.
According to Leviticus 18:22
“Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.”
According to Leviticus 18:25
“Even the land was defiled; so I punished it for its sin, and the land vomited out its inhabitants.”
According to Talmudic
Here the entire verse from Bible: KJV
Ham castrated Noah on the basis that, since Noah cursed Ham by his fourth son Canaan, Ham must have injured Noah with respect to a fourth son. Emasculating him thus deprived Noah of the possibility of a fourth son.
According to Samuel, Ham sodomized Noah, a judgment that he based on analogy with another biblical incident in which the phrase “and he saw” is used: With regard to Ham and Noah, Genesis 9 reads, “
Although the story can be taken literally, in more recent times, some scholars have suggested that Ham may have had intercourse with his father’s wife. Under this interpretation, Canaan is cursed as the “product of Ham’s illicit union.”
BBC Journalist Julie Wadsworth
Birts are now for their child molester, and their female pervert are not expection to this rule.
Juicy headline pretty tells you all you need to know:
Targeting boys for sex in woods wearing a cream ‘flasher’s mack’, stockings and suspenders… lifting her skirt to ask ‘do you want to play with this?’ Sordid double lives of Pebble Mill’s ‘Richard & Judy’
My only complain is; molesting was done by wife so her name should be fore cuckold husband.
While BBC was sending this Child molester to gather news — she was not reporting the one she was creating it! Amazingly enough other media were helping the censorship by cool down the disussion. article you’ll notice that comments & discussion section is disable. Public is not allowed to talk about this.
There is the other case of Sir Edward Heath another UK man who single, never been married. Look at the following paragraph from Times.
Did you read that? The guy is “not married”, he doesn’t have “kids”. That automaticlly makes a suspects. I guess most of you would not be surprise that current UK government does not allow single men to be hired in police, or intellgence. Only married men. Most Brits (that is white) voted for their goverment to stop non-white government. Little did they know they have elected a worst.
Finally they start called him child molester. Sir Edward Heath: Inquiry into child sex abuse allegations against former PM has battled controversy since inception.
Worst yet Men Right went out of their way to supress the news. They were saying things like “what about non-white raping white children!”. Most child molester rape within their own community.
I am planning to write an entire article about above incident. This is a perfect reminder to White MGTOW brother, you are on the wrong side of the history. Supporter conservatives has never help our cause.
Now they are using “race card” to stop an investigation against their pervert members. Don’t let this happen again.
Funny how for decade ago no one has ever accuse him for rape. Yet when he is old, and can not evenwalk. Flood of victims start popping out. All single women. These ladies use to hangout in Hollywood, and actor would pump them and dump them.
They were not maried material. Check the profile of every single so called “rape victim”. They were all prostitutes, or so called high class escorts. None of them are married.
Another old man who is on his way to senior housing. He also pushed into perv mobile
ill O’Reilly, and 90s infamous O.J. Simpsons.
In O.J. Simpsons’ case I suspect that liberal media just couldn’t handle the fact that he push woman at back of the bus. Just as poor asian kids was accusses of
Poor kids was making a S&M video. He was forcing her to give him BJ, later his girlfriend demanded he lick her vag or she’ll kill him. Media showed the clipping and ruined kids career.
Some Media Journalist wanted to have arrest for rap becaues she was 15, and he was 17. I need no tell anyone that’s not a rape case. Since they are in same age limit.
Virtually every case where politcian, or journalist is invovle mainstream newspaper “disable” comment, and discussion group on their sites.
This is from www.mgtow.com forum
The picture I am getting here is anything said by a “single” man is suspected. Once a single man is dead, he can sued, and his wealth will be given to washed up prostitue.
- Jimmy Savile: timeline of his sexual abuse and its uncovering
- Jimmy Savile sexual abuse scand
- BBC woman ‘fondled boy in park as her husband acted as look-out’
- Elm Guest House claims and controversy